525 = 500×1.05 is the value of Product A (B4 = 500) multiplied by tax rate 1 (0.05), which is the number displayed in cell D4. Since E5 has its row shifted to 5 and references Product B (B5 = 600), it does not become 525, so this is wrong.
×Incorrectイ
550 = 500×1.1 is the value of Product A (500) multiplied by tax rate 2 (0.1). E5 references Product B (600), and because of the mistyped formula the tax rate is also fixed at 0.05, so it does not become 550, which makes this wrong.
○ウ
正解In a cell reference, the parts marked with '$' stay fixed when the formula is copied, while parts without '$' shift their column or row according to the copy direction. When the mistyped formula $B4*(1.0+$D$2) is copied from D4 to E5, the column moves D→E and the row moves 4→5. In the first term $B4, column B is absolute and row 4 is relative, so only the row increases by 1, pointing to $B5 (pre-tax price = 600). In the second term $D$2, both column and row are absolutely fixed, so after copying it stays $D$2 (tax rate 1 = 0.05) unchanged. Therefore E5 = $B5×(1.0+$D$2) = 600×(1.0+0.05) = 600×1.05 = 630, and the correct answer is 'ウ'.
×Incorrectエ
660 = 600×1.1 is the value E5 would have if the correct formula $B4*(1.0+D$2) had been used. With the correct formula the column of D$2 is relative, so when copied to column E it references E$2 (tax rate 2 = 0.1), giving 600×1.1 = 660. However, in this problem the mistyped formula fixes it absolutely as $D$2, so E5 references tax rate 1 (0.05) and becomes 630. Since 660 is the value only when no typo is made, it is wrong.
ここがポイント
Behavior of absolute vs. relative references when copied: columns/rows fixed with '$' do not change when copied, while columns/rows without '$' shift by the direction and distance of the copy.
Difference between $D$2 (both column and row absolute) and D$2 (only column relative): with D$2, copying to column E gives E$2 and references tax rate 2, but $D$2 stays D2 when copied and keeps referencing tax rate 1 — this is what the typo causes.