問39
頻出度★★★
共通フレームの定義に含まれているものとして, 適切なものはどれか。
令和元年度 秋期 ITパスポート試験 問39
マネジメント系システム開発技術 › システム開発技術
This question's explanation and your answers so far.
解説
問 39
Incorrectア
The Common Frame lays out a framework for “what work is to be done”, but it does not prescribe the detailed formats and notations for how the deliverables produced in each process step are to be documented. The details of documentation are left to the discretion of each organization and project, so this is not content included in the definition and is incorrect.
- イ
正解 The Common Frame (SLCP) is a standard that defines, using a shared vocabulary and framework, “what work is to be performed” in each life-cycle process step of software — planning, requirements definition, development, operation, and maintenance. Its essence is that it organizes the work items (activities and tasks) of each process step so that the acquirer and the supplier can agree on the scope of work and responsibilities based on a shared understanding. Therefore, choice イ, “the work items of each process step in system development and maintenance”, is content included in the definition and is correct.
Incorrectウ
Defining measures of quality characteristics such as the reliability level and the maintainability level falls within the domain of the product quality model (such as ISO/IEC 25010). The Common Frame is a standard that deals with the work items of the life cycle and does not itself define measures of quality, so this is incorrect.
Incorrectエ
What the Common Frame targets is the software life-cycle process, and detailed work items concerning hardware development are outside its scope. Therefore this is not content included in the definition and is incorrect.
ここがポイント
- The Common Frame (SLCP) is a standard that defines the “work items” of each process step — planning, requirements definition, development, operation, maintenance, and so on — as a shared framework, so that the acquirer and the supplier reach a shared understanding of the scope of work and responsibilities.
- The key point is the distinction that what the Common Frame defines is the “work items”, while documentation formats, measures of quality characteristics, and the details of hardware development are all outside its scope.