ある資材を三つの工場 A,B,C に配分して,製品を生産している。資材の配分個数に応じた工場の利益は表のとおりである。合計4個の資材を工場に配分することによって得られる最大の利益は,何百万円か。 単位 百万円
| 資材の配分個数 | 0 個 | 1 個 | 2 個 | 3 個 | 4 個 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A 工場の利益 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| B 工場の利益 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| C 工場の利益 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
This question's explanation and your answers so far.
ある資材を三つの工場 A,B,C に配分して,製品を生産している。資材の配分個数に応じた工場の利益は表のとおりである。合計4個の資材を工場に配分することによって得られる最大の利益は,何百万円か。 単位 百万円
| 資材の配分個数 | 0 個 | 1 個 | 2 個 | 3 個 | 4 個 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A 工場の利益 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| B 工場の利益 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| C 工場の利益 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
8 is the value obtained when the 4 units are allocated all together to a single factory (4 units to A gives 8, 4 units to C gives 8), and similar cases. Looking closely at the table, both A and C gain little at the 4th unit (A goes 7→8, only +1; C goes 6→8, +2), so concentrating everything in one place is not a good strategy. Since combinations split among several factories can produce a total larger than 8, this is not the maximum profit.
9 is the total when 2 units go to A and 2 units to C (5+4 = 9), or 2 units to A, 1 unit to B, and 1 unit to C (5+1+3 = 9). It is certainly larger than 8, but it is not the maximum. The 3rd unit for A rises from 5 to 7, a gain of +2, so rather than stopping A at 2 units, giving A 3 units and sending the remaining 1 unit to C, that is (3,0,1) = 10, is higher. You need to compare all the patterns instead of stopping partway.
正解 This question is an optimization problem of resource allocation, asking how to distribute a limited 4 units of material so that the total profit is maximized. The profit of each factory is not proportional to the number of units allocated; it is given individually in the table, so writing out every allocation pattern and comparing the totals is the sure way. The combinations (A,B,C) that distribute a total of 4 units among A, B, and C, and their total profits, are: (4,0,0)=8, (0,4,0)=7, (0,0,4)=8, (3,1,0)=7+1=8, (3,0,1)=7+3=10, (1,3,0)=2+5=7, (0,3,1)=5+3=8, (1,0,3)=2+6=8, (0,1,3)=1+6=7, (2,2,0)=5+3=8, (2,0,2)=5+4=9, (0,2,2)=3+4=7, (2,1,1)=5+1+3=9, (1,2,1)=2+3+3=8, (1,1,2)=2+1+4=7. The largest among these is the case of allocating 3 units to Factory A and 1 unit to Factory C, giving 7+3 = 10 million yen. The key point is that for Factory A the gain per additional unit is large up to the 3rd unit (0→2→5→7) but increases by only +1 at the 4th unit, while Factory C gains a large 3 from just its 1st unit; therefore the combination of 3 units to A and 1 unit to C builds up profit most efficiently. Hence the correct answer is ウ, 10.
11 is a value that cannot be produced by any combination in the table. Under the constraint of a total of 4 units, the total profits that can be formed are exactly the 15 listed above, and the maximum among them is 10. To obtain a value greater than 10 you would have to assume profits that are not in the table, so there is no basis for it.