Practical Methods for Idea Generation and Validation
標準~37 min7 terms10 past questions
Goals of this unit
Distinguish two ways of generating new ideas: a short, intensive joint development event and an approach that starts from the people who will use the product.
Explain the purpose of verification that tests a new idea on a small scale before full development begins.
Explain the approach of building a plan from a future goal, and the method of building something small and improving it while learning.
A hackathon (ハッカソン) is a co-creation event where developers, designers and others gather to build prototypes intensively over a short period and compete on how good they are.
Theme announced
Teams formed
Rapid prototyping
Presentation and judging
Finally, teams present their results and compete under judging.
4 / 4
Participants split into teams of a few people and, following the organizer's theme, go straight from generating ideas to building a working prototype. The event usually lasts from one day to a few days, and ends with teams presenting their results for judging. Companies sometimes host one to bring in outside talent and ideas and to look for seeds of new services.
AnalogyIt is like the day before a school festival, when each class finishes its show in the limited time left, then performs it and compares how well it turned out.
How to rememberA blend of hack (cleverly building a program) and marathon (running a long course to the end).
Exam points
ExamA hackathon (ハッカソン) is an event for building a prototype in a short time and competing on the results, in which people from different roles form teams and work on a theme.
Mix-upAn ideathon (アイデアソン) centers on proposing and refining ideas, while a hackathon (ハッカソン) goes on to develop a prototype; that is where they differ.
Design thinking (デザイン思考) is an approach that takes the standpoint of the people who use a product or service, finds their real problems, and works out solutions.
Empathize
Define the problem
Ideate
Prototype and test
Have users try a simple prototype, and go back to an earlier stage if it does not work.
4 / 4
It starts not from the maker's technology or convenience but from empathy, gained by observing users' behavior and listening to them. You then state the problem clearly, generate ideas, and check them by having users try a simple prototype. If something does not work, you return to an earlier stage and repeat the cycle many times.
AnalogyIt is like a doctor who, before choosing a medicine, listens carefully to the patient and even asks about daily life to find the real cause of the illness.
How to rememberHere, "design" does not mean visual decoration; it has the broad sense of designing how something will be useful to the people who use it.
Exam points
ExamDesign thinking (デザイン思考) is a user-centered approach that defines the problem to solve through empathy with users, then shapes a solution by repeated prototyping and checking.
The persona method (ペルソナ法) portrays a typical user of a product or service as one fictional person, with a name, an age and even a lifestyle.
Item
Example setting
Name, age
Kenta Mori, 38
Job, family
Warehouse manager at a logistics firm; wife and a child in elementary school
A typical day
Leaves for work at 6 a.m.; helps the child with homework in the evening
Pain point
Spends an hour every day recounting stock
With a broad grouping like "office workers in their 30s", each person involved tends to picture someone different. Narrowing the profile to one person lets the team judge whether a feature is needed and how easy it is to use by asking how this person would feel, so everyone shares the same picture. It is used, for example, when design thinking (デザイン思考) needs a concrete image of the user.
AnalogyIt is the same idea as letter writing: words come more easily when you write to one particular person than to "everyone".
How to rememberIn Latin, persona was the mask an actor wore; from the role being played, it came to mean a character profile.
Exam points
Mix-upA persona (ペルソナ) is not a group of users bundled by age bracket or the like, but a single character profile with set personality traits and worries.
PoC (Proof of Concept, 概念実証) is verification that, before a new idea or technology is fully developed, tests it on a small scale to confirm that it actually works.
Decide what to check
Test on a small scale
Evaluate results
Decide whether to proceed
Decide whether to go into full development, revise the plan, or drop it.
4 / 4
If you commit a large budget right away, the loss is heavy when you find out after starting that the method does not work. So you first judge feasibility, such as whether it works technically and gives the expected effect, through a narrowly scoped prototype or trial. Based on the results, you decide whether to move to full development, revise the plan, or drop it.
AnalogyIt is like trying a new building method you are curious about on a small shed before building the house, to see whether it really keeps the rain out.
How to rememberThe C stands for Concept (an idea or plan), so the name reads as "proof that the idea holds up".
Exam points
ExamPoC is verification that, before full development begins, tests on a small scale whether a new idea or technology actually works.
PoV (Proof of Value, 価値実証) is verification that checks how much value a new idea or technology brings to users and the business.
Even if you can build something that works, it will not become a business unless it pays off for users and the business. A PoV judges, for example, whether users would pay to use it and whether the benefits justify the costs. The results become input for deciding whether to keep investing.
AnalogyIt is like selling a small batch of a newly developed sweet in the shop to see whether people buy it once it has a price.
How to rememberThe V stands for Value.
Exam points
Mix-upPoC checks whether an idea can be realized, while PoV checks whether what is realized is worth it, so they verify different things.
PoC (Proof of Concept) vs. PoV (Proof of Value)
Aspect
PoC (Proof of Concept)
PoV (Proof of Value)
Full name
Proof of Concept
Proof of Value
Key differenceMain focus
Whether the idea can be realized (feasibility)
Whether what is realized is worth it
Example questions
Does this method work, and does it deliver the expected effect?
Will users pay, and do the benefits justify the costs?
Backcasting (バックキャスティング) is a planning approach that first sets the future goal, then works back from it to the present to find what should be done now.
Future goal
Milestones
What to do now
Decide what to work on now toward the nearest milestone.
3 / 3
You trace backward from the goal date to work out the milestones on the way and what must be done by each point. Even for a big goal that the current trend would never reach, you can build a plan from the changes that are needed. It is used, for example, in setting long-term targets such as cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
AnalogyIt is like counting back from a trip's departure time to decide when to get up and when to leave home.
How to rememberThe word swaps the fore (forward) in forecast (prediction) for back, so you look backward from the future side.
Exam points
ExamBackcasting (バックキャスティング) is an approach that first sets a future goal, then works back from it toward the present to decide what to work on now.
Mix-upForecasting (フォアキャスティング) projects the future from the current situation and past trends and builds up from there; it differs from backcasting (バックキャスティング) in whether the starting point is now or the future.
Lean startup (リーンスタートアップ) is a method that grows a business by quickly building a minimal product, checking customer reactions, learning from them and improving, in a cycle repeated in short loops.
Build
Measure
Learn
Learn: Judge whether the hypothesis was right and feed the result into the next build.
3 / 3
The first prototype released is called an MVP (Minimum Viable Product), and it has only the features needed to test the hypothesis. The process is a loop of build, measure and learn, and depending on what you learn, you may change the direction of the business sharply. Compared with polishing a product before launch, it avoids spending time and money on development that misses the mark.
AnalogyIt is like a food stall that offers a small batch of a different trial dish each day, then changes the flavor or menu the next day based on sales and customer comments.
How to rememberLean means "without fat, without waste", reflecting an attitude of cutting out unnecessary polishing.
Exam points
ExamLean startup (リーンスタートアップ) releases an MVP early to test a hypothesis and repeats a short cycle of learning from customer reactions and fixing the product.